Compare Archives - 6ix Network

Google Pixel Watch 2 vs Fitbit Sense: Best Smartwatch?

by 6ix Network with No Comment Compare Smartwatches

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Buy on Amazon

Specifications and Features

Specification	Google Pixel Watch 2	Fitbit Sense Advanced Smartwatch
Operating System	Wear OS 3	Fitbit OS
Compatibility	Android, iOS	Android, iOS
Display Type	AMOLED	AMOLED
Display Size	1.2 inches	1.58 inches
Resolution	450 x 450 pixels	336 x 336 pixels
Processor	Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100	Custom Fitbit processor
RAM	1GB	1GB
Storage	8GB	4GB
Battery Life	Up to 24 hours	Up to 6 days
Charging Method	Wireless charging	Magnetic charging
Water Resistance	50 meters	50 meters
Sensors	Heart rate, ECG, SpO2, accelerometer	Heart rate, ECG, EDA, SpO2, GPS
GPS	Yes	Yes
Connectivity	Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, LTE (optional)	Wi-Fi, Bluetooth
Voice Assistant	Google Assistant	Alexa
Fitness Tracking	Yes	Yes
Sleep Tracking	Yes	Yes
ECG	Yes	Yes
Stress Management	No	Yes (EDA sensor)
Health Monitoring	Yes	Yes
Price	Starting at $349	Starting at $299
Release Date	October 2023	September 2020
Dimensions	41 x 41 x 12.3 mm	40.48 x 40.48 x 12.35 mm
Weight	36g	48g

Operating System and Compatibility

The Google Pixel Watch 2 runs on Wear OS 3, providing a more integrated experience with Google’s ecosystem, including Google Assistant and Google apps.

The Fitbit Sense uses Fitbit OS, which is designed specifically for health and fitness tracking. Both are compatible with Android and iOS devices.

Display

The Google Pixel Watch 2 features a smaller, higher-resolution AMOLED display (450 x 450 pixels) compared to the Fitbit Sense’s larger 1.58-inch AMOLED display (336 x 336 pixels), providing crisper visuals on the Pixel Watch 2.

Processor and Performance

The Google Pixel Watch 2 is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100 processor, which offers a robust performance for smartwatch applications. The Fitbit Sense uses a custom Fitbit processor optimized for fitness tracking.

Battery Life

The Fitbit Sense has a significantly longer battery life, lasting up to 6 days, compared to the Google Pixel Watch 2’s 24-hour battery life, making it more suitable for continuous health monitoring.

Sensors and Health Features

Both smartwatches offer comprehensive health monitoring with heart rate, ECG, and SpO2 sensors. However, the Fitbit Sense includes additional features such as the EDA sensor for stress management.

GPS and Connectivity

Both watches have built-in GPS for tracking outdoor activities. The Google Pixel Watch 2 offers optional LTE connectivity, allowing it to function independently of a smartphone, whereas the Fitbit Sense relies on Bluetooth and Wi-Fi.

Voice Assistant

The Google Pixel Watch 2 uses Google Assistant, while the Fitbit Sense comes with Alexa. The choice of voice assistant might depend on user preference and existing ecosystem.

Fitness and Sleep Tracking

Both devices offer advanced fitness and sleep tracking capabilities, catering to users focused on health and wellness.

Price and Release Date

The Google Pixel Watch 2 is priced starting at $349 and was released in October 2023, offering newer hardware and software. The Fitbit Sense is priced at $299 and was released in September 2020, making it a more budget-friendly option with a focus on health and fitness.

The Google Pixel Watch 2 and Fitbit Sense Advanced Smartwatch cater to different user needs. The Google Pixel Watch 2 is ideal for those looking for a comprehensive smartwatch experience with strong integration into the Google ecosystem and newer hardware. The Fitbit Sense, on the other hand, is better suited for users who prioritize extensive health and fitness tracking features, including stress management, and prefer longer battery life. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.

Buy on Amazon

Google Pixel Watch 2
Fitbit Sense

COMPARE: Samsung Odyssey G50D vs ASUS ROG Swift: Gaming Monitor Showdown

Read our reviews that will provide insights into the real-world performance and reliability of computers and laptops.

REVIEWS: Smartwatches

TECH NEWS: TikTok Introduces Revolutionary Sound Search Feature

Samsung Odyssey G50D vs ASUS ROG Swift: Gaming Monitor Showdown

2 months ago

by 6ix Network with No Comment Compare Monitors

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Buy on Amazon

Asus ROG Swift PG259QNR
Samsung Odyssey G50D

Specifications and Features

Specification	Samsung Odyssey G50D 27-Inch QHD Fast IPS Gaming Monitor	ASUS ROG Swift 360Hz PG259QNR 24.5” HDR Gaming Monitor
Screen Size	27 inches	24.5 inches
Resolution	2560 x 1440 (QHD)	1920 x 1080 (FHD)
Panel Type	Fast IPS	Fast IPS
Refresh Rate	165Hz	360Hz
Response Time	1ms (GTG)	1ms (GTG)
HDR	HDR10	HDR10
Brightness	350 cd/m²	400 cd/m²
Contrast Ratio	1000:1	1000:1
Color Gamut	95% DCI-P3	98% sRGB
Adaptive Sync Technology	FreeSync Premium	G-SYNC
Viewing Angle	178°/178°	178°/178°
Ports	1x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x USB 3.0	1x DisplayPort 1.4, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x USB 3.0
Ergonomics	Height, tilt, swivel, pivot	Height, tilt, swivel, pivot
Dimensions (with stand)	611.1 x 576.0 x 248.9 mm	557 x 499 x 247 mm
Weight	6.6 kg	7.1 kg
Design	Borderless design, matte black finish	Sleek design, matte black finish
Built-in Speakers	No	No
VESA Mount Compatibility	Yes (100 x 100 mm)	Yes (100 x 100 mm)
Power Consumption	45W	27W
Additional Features	Eye Saver Mode, Flicker-Free, Game Mode	NVIDIA Reflex Latency Analyzer, GamePlus, GameVisual
Price	$329.99	$699.99
Release Date	Q3 2021	Q4 2020

Screen Size and Resolution

The Samsung Odyssey G50D has a larger screen size of 27 inches with a QHD resolution of 2560 x 1440, providing a more detailed and spacious viewing experience.

The ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR, with a 24.5-inch screen and FHD resolution of 1920 x 1080, focuses more on delivering high refresh rates and speed.

Refresh Rate and Response Time

The ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR stands out with a 360Hz refresh rate, significantly higher than the 165Hz of the Samsung Odyssey G50D. Both monitors have a fast 1ms response time, ensuring smooth gameplay with minimal motion blur.

HDR and Brightness

Both monitors support HDR10, enhancing the dynamic range for more vivid visuals. The ASUS monitor has a slightly higher brightness of 400 cd/m² compared to the Samsung’s 350 cd/m², making it better suited for bright environments.

Color Gamut and Accuracy

The Samsung Odyssey G50D covers 95% of the DCI-P3 color gamut, while the ASUS ROG Swift covers 98% of the sRGB spectrum, both providing rich and accurate colors suitable for gaming and content creation.

Adaptive Sync Technology

The Samsung Odyssey G50D uses FreeSync Premium, which is ideal for AMD graphics card users. The ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR features G-SYNC, designed to work seamlessly with NVIDIA graphics cards, reducing screen tearing and stuttering.

Ergonomics and Build Quality

Both monitors offer extensive ergonomic adjustments, including height, tilt, swivel, and pivot, allowing for customizable setups to enhance comfort during long gaming sessions. Both also feature a sleek, matte black finish and a borderless design for a modern aesthetic.

Ports and Connectivity

Both monitors have similar connectivity options, including DisplayPort, HDMI, and USB 3.0 ports, ensuring compatibility with various devices.

Additional Features:

The ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR includes the NVIDIA Reflex Latency Analyzer, GamePlus, and GameVisual features, catering to competitive gamers seeking performance insights and enhanced gameplay settings. The Samsung Odyssey G50D includes Eye Saver Mode, Flicker-Free technology, and Game Mode to reduce eye strain and optimize the gaming experience.

Price and Release Date

The ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR is priced higher at $699.99 compared to the Samsung Odyssey G50D at $329.99, reflecting its focus on high refresh rates and competitive gaming features. The ASUS monitor was released in Q4 2020, while the Samsung monitor was released in Q3 2021.

Both the Samsung Odyssey G50D and the ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR offer impressive features tailored to different gaming preferences. The Samsung Odyssey G50D is ideal for gamers who prefer a larger screen with higher resolution and a more affordable price point. In contrast, the ASUS ROG Swift PG259QNR is perfect for competitive gamers who prioritize ultra-high refresh rates and advanced gaming features, despite the higher cost.